Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Thursday, 14 October 2010

London Mayor, Boris Johnson, Cuts Funds to Black History Month

3 comments

In February this year I was disgusted to read that Boris Johnson, the current Mayor of London, had slashed funding for big multi-cultural events while putting £100,000 into a new venture to celebrate America. Here is a portion from the Guardian report:

Figures seen by the Guardian show that the London mayor cut funding for Black History Month, a series of events staged in October to celebrate black culture in the capital, from £132,000 to £10,000, though city hall insists the previous figure was £76,000. Africa Day’s £100,000 grant from the London Development Agency was axed completely and a decision to cut funding for the St Patrick’s Day celebration was roundly criticised last year. Funding for Jewish events was halved to £50,000.

Johnson was accused of “subsidising wealthy Americans” after the Guardian reported earlier this year that the development agency, the mayor’s economic arm, had allocated £75,000 to USA Day. It emerged yesterday that the mayor has agreed to top this up with a further £25,000 from the Greater London Authority (GLA), bringing the total to £100,000.

This information clearly demonstrates where Boris Johnson's loyalties lie and, to be honest, do not help the perception of him being a racist, elitist, out-of-touch, suck-up Conservative.

The 2007 estimates for the number of Black people in London (including those with a mixed black heritage) were 12.1% and 12% were Irish. A study in 2002 found there were 195,000 Jewish people living in London, the 13th highest city in the world.

As for the number of American people living in London? The 2001 census recorded 44,622. Jamaica alone had 80,319 while Ireland had 157,285.

So now we have a few facts, lets step back and look at this decision:

The Mayor of London decides to cut funding to celebrate Black, Irish and Jewish events, with some funding being cut altogether, despite the fact that these three cultural groups make up a substantial portion of the population of London, a city that PRIDES itself on its cultural diversity and loves to celebrate it. He then grants £100,000 to a culture which in 2001 made up 0.85% OF THE LONDON POPULATION.

The Guardian says: Johnson has previously defended the move as part of a drive to attract more American tourists to the capital

So is Mr Johnson suggesting that Americans won't go anywhere that doesn't big up their country? Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't going holiday suggest you want to explore a new and different culture rather than celebrate your own? How many Americans sit at home and think 'oh I wish I could celebrate America... I know, I'LL GO TO THE UK! THEY HAVE USA DAY!'?

Responding to the outrage of this decision, a spokesman for the mayor said:
"Events must have local and community support if they are to add value and make a proper contribution to community cohesion in London, and as has been seen with the celebrations for St Patrick's Day and a new Jewish cultural festival that is coming up, it is possible for communities themselves to create greatly enhanced events, but with reduced GLA funding. The GLA does not own Black History Month or Africa Day, but we would hope community groups would be able to develop programmes that mark these in a similar way."

This is possibly the angriest a Tory politician has ever made me - OH WAIT STRIKE THAT, NOW THEY'RE INCREASING UNIVERSITY TUITION FEES, THE ELITIST BASTARDS! - and I cannot wait for the Mayoral Election when I can do my bit in helping kick Boris Johnson the hell out.

Robyn

To read the full article, click here

Tuesday, 28 September 2010

Who is Confucius? The teachings, politics and philosophy.

0 comments

Confucius was a Chinese thinker and social philosopher who continues to have a profound effect on politics and philosophy thousands of years after his death. His philosophy emphasized personal and governmental morality, correctness of social relationships, justice and sincerity. Confucius sought to build a great, harmonious and humanistic society. Confucius's works are studied by scholars in China and many other Asian countries such as Korea, Japan and Vietnam. Also, on this day many of these countries hold a traditional ceremony for his birthday.

The tradition that bears his name – “Confucianism” (Chinese: Rujia) – ultimately traces itself to the sayings and biographical fragments recorded in the text known as the Analects (Chinese: Lunyu).

Confucius represented his teachings as lessons transmitted from antiquity. He claimed that he was “a transmitter and not a maker” and that all he did reflected his “reliance on and love for the ancients.” Rather than trying to build a systematic ideology or establish rules for society, Confucius wanted his disciples to think for themselves and study the outside world. He disparages those who have faith in natural understanding or intuition and argues that the only real understanding of a subject comes from long and careful study. Study, for Confucius, means finding a good teacher and imitating his words and deeds. He taught through personal exemplification rather than explicit rules of behaviour. His moral teachings emphasized self-cultivation, emulation of moral exemplars, and the attainment of skilled judgment rather than knowledge of rules. His ethical ideals and methods are conveyed indirectly, for example:

When the stables were burnt down, on returning from court, Confucius said, 'Was anyone hurt?' He did not ask about the horses.
Analects X.11, tr. Arthur Waley

Which teaches that you should value human beings over property and it leads readers to reflect on what their response would have been: would they have asked about the horses or the humans?

In times of division, chaos and endless wars, Confucius wanted to unify the world and bestow peace and prosperity on the people. He proposes a new political agenda: a revival of a unified royal state, whose rulers would succeed to power on the basis of their moral merits instead of lineage; these would be rulers devoted to their people, striving for personal and social perfection. Such a ruler would spread his own virtues to the people instead of imposing proper behavior with laws and rules. Confucius thought that a ruler who had to resort to force had already failed as a ruler:

"Your job is to govern, not to kill"

Confucius' political thought is based upon his ethical thought. He argues that the best government is one that rules through "rites" and people's natural morality, rather than by using bribery and coercion. While he supported the idea of government by an all-powerful and wise leader, his ideas contained a number of elements to limit the power of rulers. He argued for according language with truth and placed great importance on honesty.

Confucius' social philosophy focused on the concept of ren, “compassion” or “loving others.” Cultivating or practising compassion for others meant deprecating yourself which meant avoiding deceitful or manipulative behaviour, or being false and giving people the idea that you are wonderful, thus self-aggrandizing yourself. For Confucius, such concern for others is demonstrated through the practice of forms of the Golden Rule:

“What you do not wish for yourself, do not do to others;”
“Since you yourself desire standing then help others achieve it, since you yourself desire success then help others attain it.”
(Lunyu 12.2, 6.30).

He saw devotion to parents and older siblings as the most basic form of putting the interests of others before your own and teaches that this practise of unselfish concern for others can be accomplished only by those who have learned self-discipline.

Confucius' goal wass to create gentlemen who carried themselves with grace, spoke correctly and demonstrated great integrity. His strong dislike of the selfish “petty men,” whose clever talk and pretentious manner win them an audience, is reflected passages of his teachings.

While many people may think of Indian or Chinese philosophy as intuitionistic or mystical Confucianism has been said to be a hundred times more rationalistic than Western philosophy. It is thought that Confucianism had considerable importance on European thinkers of the period, particularly among the Deists and other philosophical groups of the Enlightenment who were interested by the integration of the system of morality of Confucius into Western civilization.

While Confucius idea's of paternalism seem to embody conservatism, his ideas of rulers for the people remind me greatly of the early liberal enlightment thinkers giving him an almost middle ground political philosophy. Unfortunately, morals have not played a very important part in politics for a very, very long time and many of the thoughts in Confucianism could never work in today's society. Nevertheless Confucianism provides such a faith in human nature and strong virtues to strive towards, it is no wonder that Confucianism is now one of the religions of China.

Information from:

Tuesday, 31 August 2010

Thought Black People Had It Tough? Try Being Untouchable.

3 comments
Living in the West, when I hear about discrimination I think of gender, race, religion and even age. One word that doesn't come to mind is caste but for an estimated 250 million people worldwide, caste discrimination is a serious problem. A caste is a combined social system of occupation, endogamy (marriage within a specific ethnic group), culture, social class, and political power. According to UNICEF, discrimination based on caste is prevalent mainly in parts of Asia and Africa.

The Indian caste system is comprised of four different castes, and outcasted social groups. Caste barriers have mostly broken down in large cities, though they persist in rural areas of the country, where 72% of India's population resides. In some rural areas and small towns, the caste system is still very rigid. The Government of India has officially documented castes and sub-castes, primarily to determine those deserving reservation (positive discrimination in education and jobs) through the census. The Indian reservation system, though limited in scope, relies entirely on quotas. The Government lists consist of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes.The caste-based reservations in India have led to widespread protests, such as the 2006 Indian anti-reservation protests, with many complaining of reverse discrimination against the forward castes (the castes that do not qualify for the reservation). Many view negative treatment of forward castes as socially divisive and equally wrong.

Independent India has witnessed a considerable amount of violence and hate crimes motivated by caste. Various incidents of violence against Dalits have been reported from many parts of India. Dalit is a self-designation for a group of people traditionally regarded as of lower class and unsuitable for making personal relationships. Dalits are a mixed population of numerous caste groups all over South Asia, and speak various languages.According to a report by Human Rights Watch, "Dalits and indigenous peoples (known as Scheduled Tribes or adivasis) continue to face discrimination, exclusion, and acts of communal violence. Laws and policies adopted by the Indian government provide a strong basis for protection, but are not being faithfully implemented by local authorities."

What disturbed me most when I was researching the violence against Dalits in India was the number of massacres, the latest one being the Kherlanji massacre in 2006. On September 29, 2006, four members of the Bhotmange family belonging to the Dalit underclass were slaughtered in Kherlanji, a small village in Bhandara district of Maharashtra. The women of the family, Surekha and Priyanka, were paraded naked in public then allegedly gang-raped before being murdered. Although initially ascribed by the media and by the Human Rights Watch to upper castes, the criminal act was actually carried out by Kunbi caste (classified as Other Backward Classes by Government of India) farmers for having opposed the requisition of the Dalit land to have a road built over it.


The Nepalese caste system, like the Indian caste system, is highly complex and continues the traditional system of social stratification of Nepal. The castes of Nepal have been placed into 5 hierarchies with the following order of precedence:
  • Thagadhari, (Wearer of holy cord)
  • Matwali
  • Namasyane Matwali (Non-enslavable alcohol-drinkers)
  • Masyane Matwali (Enslavable alcohol drinkers)
  • Pani nachalne choichoto halnu naparne, (Impure but touchable castes)
  • Pani nachalne chiochoti halnu parne, (Impure and Untouchable castes)
The supreme caste communities make ornaments, weapons pottery and others. The castes have different names: Kamis (Iron-smiths), Sunars (Gold-smiths), Lohars (Iron smiths), Vishwakarmas (V.K.), Sobh, Snehi Nepali, etc. They have been named after the professions they are found to be engaged in. For instance, one who is engaged in works related to gold is a Sonar; one who constructs a house or makes pots is an Od; the person who makes things out of copper is a Tamta.

However, Nepalese society is clearly split into touchables and untouchables as touchables have no marital relation with them, and do not allow them to enter their houses. The situation of caste-based untouchability existing in the country depends heavily on what region of the country you are in. Untouchability exists in its extreme form especially in the hills and mountains of the remote western region. Untouchable castes have been prohibited from their entrance into temples and other public places. For instance, the untouchables are not allowed to enter the fair held annually at Dehimandau in Baitadi district and open stalls. They have to sit outside restaurants and wash eating utensils. At many places there also exists the practice of sprinkling water for purification. Milk and milk products are not given to the untouchables to drink and eat.Untouchable boys and girls are discriminated even at public schools. They have to use separate pots for drinking water. They have also to sit separately in the class as ink is defiled with their touch.

With the advent of democracy in 1950, social discriminations started breaking down not because of any legal provisions but because of the high caste people's own initiatives. However, even this change could not abolish untouchability. Though public places were opened to low caste people in some places, the situation remained unchanged to a large extent. There has been made a legal sanction in the civil code against untouchability; however, it has turned out to be meaningless since its violation is not liable to any specific penalty.

In West Africa, the Osu caste system in Nigeria and southern Cameroon, can be traced back to an indigenous religious belief system, practiced within the Igbo nation. It is the belief of many Igbo traditionalists that the Osus are people historically owned by deities, and are therefore considered to be a 'living sacrifice', an outcaste, untouchable and sub-human. People regarded as modern-day Osu in Igboland are descendants of individuals who volunteered and were sacrificed to the various gods. These fore-fathers pledged themselves and their descendants to these gods. They enjoyed protection and privileges but were segregated from ordinary people. Osu people married, fraternized and socialized among themselves. This practice continues to this day. An ordinary Igbo person would not marry or permit any of his relations to marry an Osu person. In the few instances where this has happened, the non-Osu who married the Osu became infested and was from then on regarded as Osu.

The East African caste system in Rwanda, Burundi and eastern Congo it is known as ubuhake. The Tutsi, who comprise about 15% of the population of these areas were the ruling, Cattle-owning caste. Below them were the Hutu, the farmers who made up about 80% of the population. Fewer than 3% of the population are Twa or Pygmies. During the German authorative control over Rwanda and Burundi, the authorities reinforced the system by employing Tutsis in hegemonic (dominating, leaders) roles. The Belgian colonialists who succeeded them after World War I continued this policy, instituting 'ethnic' identity cards. After independence, tensions intensified. In 1972, Tutsis were responsible for a wholesale massacre of Hutus. In the 1990s, Hutus responded with counter-massacres. See our posts on the Rwandan Genocide to find out more (in the posts for Rwanda under 'around the world...').

While many of the discrimination towards 'untouchables' and other 'low' castes is similar to the discrimination of ethnic minorities under white people in the west, the disturbing difference is that the discrimination against so-called 'untouchables' IS STILL HAPPENING. Imagine it. Martin Luther King's dream never happened. Equality never happened. There are still signs outside shops saying "No Dogs, No Negroes". For that to still exist in the 21st century would be unacceptable and unthinkable so why is it any different for castes? I personally think a lot of it is ignorance. We simply don't know what's going on. Even I am guilty. I had heard the term 'untouchable' many times but, never knowing what it was, assumed it was an insulting name for people with leprosy or something like that. I knew a lot about the Rwandan genocide but never realised that it wasn't just a one-off situation. This post only contains a raindrop of the ocean of countries across the globe with castes and caste systems.

It can be easy to shrug and say 'what can we do?' but something CAN be done. There have been many countries like Korea, Hawai, Japan, Spanish America and England that used to have castes systems and don't any longer. There are also countries like Bali that have castes systems but there are no 'untouchables' and there is mobility within the castes so one family can contain many castes and they can marry one another. This discrimination is wrong and the first step to beating it is telling everyone its out there, its wrong and we aren't going to accept it. Tell some friends, work with the charities and touch an untouchable.

Information from:

Saturday, 28 August 2010

Multiculturalism And Its Impact On Democratic Society

0 comments

Friday, 28 May 2010

Black Studies

0 comments
Black Studies

Black studies is defined as the study of African-Americans, their culture, and contributions to society. Black studies covers aspect of the institution of slavery and progression of segregation in post-civil war United States. Likewise, the African-Americans had triumphed throughout these perilous times. African-American leaders began to emerge and create movements that would establish a Black identity; some of these movements include the Black Arts Movement, The Nation of Islam, Civil Rights Movement, Black Power Movement, and the Black Nationalist Movement/ Universal Negro Improvement Association.

The Black Nationalist Movement was one of the most groundbreaking movements of Black history. This movement was a political and social movement which promoted the education and political recognition of black Americans.[1] Some people have traced this movement Marcus Garvey’s Universal Negro Improvement Association. This association sought to gain economic power and incorporate blacks into the idea of a community.

Likewise, The Black Nationalist Movement under Gravey’s leadership was primarily based to enhance the life of African-Americans. This movement had two core values which were black pride and racial separatism, ideally Gravey wanted African-Americans completely separate from white society. Judging by what caused these movements they accurately represent responses from a hostile white society. I take reference from a book titled the Production of the Afro-American where it reads “black nationalists maintain that in order for Afro-Americans to liberate themselves from oppression, some degree of autonomy from the dominant society is essential.” Marcus Garvey strongly believed that this separation would allow for blacks to take control of their communities, maintain economic stability, and promote peaceful living environments. [2]

In addition, while looking at the Black Nationalist Movement we must not forget the movement of the Nation of Islam by Malcolm X. This movement was a religious movement that captivated hundreds and thousands of African-Americans, so much that they converted to the religious Islamic practice. During this movement the Nation of Islam taught Muslim beliefs, created black businesses and schools, and rehabilitated former drug addicts into their former functional selves[3]. These participants of this movement were perceived to be the conscious of blacks and ones who would help blacks to achieve some form of success. Many people began to follow this movement because to some it is because of the Nation of Islam that they got their lives back and enjoyed life as they did before drugs.

In contrast, this movement became under fire when the Civil Rights Movement began by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. The Civil Rights Movement was a movement of protests and political action by thousands of American citizens. The start of such a monumental movement has been attributed to Rosa Parks a woman whom refused to give up her seat on a bus to a white man. This is the spark that had lead to one of the biggest boycotts in American history.[4] These boycotts would lead to certain businesses economic demise since there would not be any protestor’s patronizing their businesses. This movement is known for being a non-violent movement. Police would resort to inhumane methods of crowd control by hosing people down and attacking them with dogs, yet the protestors stood their strong waiting for their voice to be heard.

Lastly, the Black Power movement was a movement started by the Black Panthers. This movement was hailed as the positive force that helped blacks achieve full equality with whites. This movement installed a since of racial pride, self-esteem, and promotion of political participation.[5] The Black Power movement encouraged individuals to instill racial pride and unity. It is from this movement that the Black Art Movement occurred where young black poets, authors, and visual artists found their voices and shared those voices with others. This movement sought out a black audience.

It is through these different movements that the emergence of Black Studies emerged. The objective is to analyze the economic and political reason for slavery in America, provide valuable information regarding blacks and their lives in America. In addition to providing the role of geography plays a role in determining slavery and its effects on the world.

Ancient Kemet played a major role in World History since it established one of the first educational systems the world has ever seen. Egyptian believed that their purpose in life was to live and become a God, this created a society that is heavily based on its divinity. Formal education was one way Egyptians used to attain life’s purpose. Kemet’s scholars taught the Seven Liberal Arts in the Mystery Schools to liberate the person’s soul from its body, which would allow the student to ultimately reach the level of Spiritual Consciousness. Education was to bring out and develop the “good” or “divine” already inside a person. For example, Studying Grammar, Rhetoric and Logic, for example, would remove a person’s “irrational tendencies of behavior” because these subjects were conveyors for moral development. [6]

The legacy of Egypt is debated because it flourished around 3000 B.C. which is inconceivable to those who view Jerusalem as the start of civilization. In addition to this, the idea the Africans began and maintained one of the most advanced civilizations on the planet seems inconceivable. This starts a debate which has lasted hundreds of years .The Kemet tradition naturally belongs to the blacks.[7] We were here before the colonization of Egypt and therefore the land quite naturally belongs to the Africans. During this time the whites came and occupied this land which they exploited for their own goods since it has close proximity to the Nile River.

It is important to study Ancient Egypt and Classical African Civilizations be integrated into African-American studies since it is an ancient civilization in Africa. Egypt should not be taken out of studies because it was originally Kemet which is a part of Africa, there has only been a name change. The contributions of this people and their society should still be noted in African-American studies. This helps in establishing a foundation in African-American studies; it allows us to see exactly what our people had to endure and the hardships that we had to endure. Without doing so the history of African-Americans will remain untold, this creates a perception of partial truths. The complete history of African-Americans should be explored.

The purpose of both of these compromises were to stop the spreading of slavery, although they had similar motives their methods could not be any different. By 1818, the state of Missouri had gained enough population to be entered into the Union. Due to its settlers coming from the South it was expected that Missouri would become a slave state. [8] In 1819, Representative James Tallradge proposed an amendment to ban slavery in Missouri, which is what the South’s economy was based upon. It is through Sen. Henry Clay this compromise was created. The Missouri Compromise stipulated that all the Louisiana Purchase territory north of the southern boundary of Missouri, except Missouri, would be free, and the territory below that line would be slave.

In opposition, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was created. The act was created when Senator Stephen Douglas wanted to build a transcontinental railway which had to pass through the Nebraska. Douglas suggested that the territory become two states, Nebraska entering as a free state and Kansas deciding by popular sovereignty. [9]This nullified the Missouri Compromise entirely however the South agreed. People in the North against the expansion of slavery paid for people to move to Kansas and vote against slavery. This angered the South and resulted in Southerners crossing the border on voting day to vote in for slavery. Violence erupted and a civil war broke out in 'bleeding Kansas'.[10] This can be called the spark of the Civil War since it successfully put the Northerners and the Southerners at war with each other.



[1] Gordon, Dexter. Black Identity: Rhetoric, Ideology, and Nineteenth-Century Black Nationalism (Southern Illinois Univerisity Press, 2003), 37

[2] Gordon, Dexter. Black Identity: Rhetoric, Ideology, and Nineteenth-Century Black Nationalism (Southern Illinois Univerisity Press, 2003), 39

[3]PBS. “The Story of the Movement-The Nation of Islam and Malcolm X”. PBS. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/eyesontheprize/story/11_noi.html (accessed March 11, 2010)

[4] Levy, Peter. The Civil Rights (London: Greenwood Press Westport, 1998) 127

[5] James McEvoy and Abraham Miller. Black Power and Student Rebellion. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 1969), 233

[6] Suite101. Ancient Kemet’s World View. Suite 101. http://africanhistory.suite101.com/article.cfm/ancient_kemets_world_view (accessed March 13, 2010)

[7] Henderson, Anthony. Afrocentrism and World Politics: Towards a New Paradigm. (Wesport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 1995), 89

[8] Jones, Charles. Missouri: The Heart of the Nation. (Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson Publishing, 2004), 110

[9] Goodrich, Thomas. War to knife: Bleeding Kansas, 1854-1861. (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press., 2004), 42

[10] Civil War. Secession Crisis. http://civilwar.bluegrass.net/secessioncrisis/200303.html (accessed March 14, 2010)

ftn5[ � p �? � oFootnoteText>[5] James McEvoy and Abraham Miller. Black Power and Student Rebellion. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 1969), 233

[6] Suite101. Ancient Kemet’s World View. Suite 101. http://africanhistory.suite101.com/article.cfm/ancient_kemets_world_view (accessed March 13, 2010)

[7] Henderson, Anthony. Afrocentrism and World Politics: Towards a New Paradigm. (Wesport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 1995), 89

[8] Jones, Charles. Missouri: The Heart of the Nation. (Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson Publishing, 2004), 110

[9] Goodrich, Thomas. War to knife: Bleeding Kansas, 1854-1861. (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press., 2004), 42

[10] Civil War. Secession Crisis. http://civilwar.bluegrass.net/secessioncrisis/200303.html (accessed March 14, 2010)

Monday, 3 May 2010

The importance of press freedom

0 comments
The United Nations General Assembly declared 3 May to be World Press Freedom Day to raise awareness of the importance of freedom of the press and remind governments of their duty to respect and uphold the right to freedom of expression enshrined under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and marking the anniversary of the Declaration of Windhoek, a statement of free press principles put together by African newspaper journalists in 1991.

Freedom of the press is the freedom of communication and expression through vehicles including various electronic media and published materials. While such freedom mostly implies the absence of interference from an overreaching state, its preservation may be sought through constitutional or other legal protections.

With respect to governmental information, any government may distinguish which materials are public or protected from disclosure to the public based on classification of information as sensitive, classified or secret and being otherwise protected from disclosure due to relevance of the information to protecting the national interest. Many governments are also subject to sunshine laws or freedom of information legislation that are used to define the ambit of national interest.

According to Reporters Without Borders, more than a third of the world's people live in countries where there is no press freedom. Overwhelmingly, these people live in countries where there is no system of democracy or where there are serious deficiencies in the democratic process. Freedom of the press is an extremely problematic problem/concept for most non-democratic systems of government since, in the modern age, strict control of access to information is critical to the existence of most non-democratic governments and their associated control systems and security apparatus.

World opinion is divided on the importance of having a free press, according to a poll conducted for the BBC World Service in 2007. Of those interviewed, 56% thought that freedom of the press was very important to ensure a free society but 40% said it was more important to maintain social harmony and peace, even if it meant curbing the press's freedom to report news truthfully. The strongest endorsement came from North America and Western Europe, where up to 70% put freedom first, followed by Venezuela, Kenya and South Africa, with over 60%. In India, Singapore and Russia, by contrast, more people favoured stability over press freedom.

Freedom of the Press is a yearly report by US-based non-governmental organization Freedom House, measuring the level of freedom and editorial independence enjoyed by the press in every nation and significant disputed territories around the world. Levels of freedom are scored on a scale from 1 (most free) to 100 (least free). Depending on the basics, the nations are then classified as "Free", "Partly Free", or "Not Free". If you would like to see the results of this report - which differs slightly from the Reporters Without Borders freedom of the press index - then click on the third link at the bottom of this post.

Every year, Reporters Without Borders establishes a ranking of countries in terms of their freedom of the press. Below is the ranking for 2009:

1 Denmark 0.00
1 Finland 0.00
1 Ireland 0.00
1 Norway 0.00
1 Sweden 0.00
6 Estonia 0.50
7 Netherlands 1.00
7 Switzerland 1.00
9 Iceland 2.00
10 Lithuania 2.25
11 Belgium 2.50
11 Malta 2.50
13 Austria 3.00
13 Latvia 3.00
13 New Zealand 3.00
16 Australia 3.13
17 Japan 3.25
18 Germany 3.50
19 Canada 3.70
20 Luxembourg 4.00
20 United Kingdom 4.00
20 United States 4.00
23 Jamaica 4.75
24 Czech Republic 5.00
25 Cyprusa 5.50
25 Hungary 5.50
27 Ghana 6.00
28 Trinidad and Tobago 7.00
29 Uruguay 7.63
30 Costa Rica 8.00
30 Mali 8.00
30 Portugal 8.00
33 South Africa 8.50
34 Macedonia 8.75
35 Greece 9.00
35 Namibia 9.00
37 Poland 9.50
37 Slovenia 9.50
39 Bosnia and Herzegovina 10.50
39 Chile 10.50
39 Guyana 10.50 42 Suriname 10.60
43 France 10.67
44 Cape Verde 11.00
44 Slovakia 11.00
44 Spain 11.00
47 Argentina 11.33
48 Hong Kong 11.75
Grenada 12.00
49 Italy 12.14
50 Romania 12.50
51 Northern Cyprusb 14.00
51 Maldives 14.00
51 Mauritius 14.00
54 Paraguay 14.33
55 Panama 14.50
56 Papua New Guinea 14.70
57 Burkina Faso 15.00
57 Haiti 15.00
59 Republic of China (Taiwan) 15.08
60 Kuwait 15.25
61 Lebanon 15.42
62 Botswana 15.50
63 Liberia 15.50
63 Malawi 15.50
63 Serbiac 15.50
63 Tanzania 15.50
63 Togo 15.50
68 Bulgaria 15.61
69 South Korea 15.67
70 Bhutan 15.75
71 Brazil 15.88
72 Benin 16.00
72 Seychelles 16.00
72 Timor-Leste 16.00
75 Kosovod 16.58
76 Nicaragua 16.75
77 Montenegroc 17.00
78 Croatia 17.17
79 El Salvador 17.25
80 Central African Republic 17.75
Tonga 18.00
81 Georgia 18.83
82 Comoros 19.00
82 Mozambique 19.00
84 Ecuador 20.00
85 Peru 20.88
86 Uganda 21.50
86 United Arab Emirates 21.50
88 Albania 21.75
89 Senegal 22.00
89 Ukraine 22.00
91 Mongolia 23.33
92 Guinea-Bissau 23.50
93 Israel (Israeli territory) 23.75
94 Qatar 24.00
95 Bolivia 24.17
96 Kenya 25.00
97 Zambia 26.75
98 Dominican Republic 26.83
99 Lesotho 27.50
100 Guinea 28.50
100 Indonesia 28.50
100 Mauritania 28.50
103 Burundi 29.00
103 Côte d'Ivoire 29.00
105 India 29.33
106 Guatemala 29.50
106 Oman 29.50
108 United States (extra-territorial) 30.00
109 Cameroon 30.50
110 Djibouti 31.00
111 Armenia 31.13
112 Jordan 31.88
113 Tajikistan 32.00
114 Moldova 33.75
115 Sierra Leone 34.00
116 Republic of the Congo 34.75
117 Cambodia 35.17
118 Nepal 35.63
119 Angola 36.50
119 Bahrain 36.50
121 Bangladesh 37.33
122 Philippines 38.25
122 Turkey 38.25
124 Venezuela 39.50
125 Kyrgyzstan 40.00
126 Colombia 40.13
127 Morocco 41.00
128 Honduras 42.00
129 Gabon 43.50
130 Thailand 44.00
131 Malaysia 44.25
132 Chad 44.50
133 Singapore 45.00
134 Madagascar 45.83
135 Nigeria 46.00
136 Zimbabwe 46.50
137 Gambia 48.25
137 Mexico 48.25
139 Niger 48.50
140 Ethiopia 49.00
141 Algeria 49.56
142 Kazakhstan 49.67
143 Egypt 51.38
144 Swaziland 52.50
145 Iraq 53.30
146 Azerbaijan 53.50
146 Democratic Republic of the Congo 53.50
148 Sudan 54.00
149 Afghanistan 54.25
150 Israel (extra-territorial) 55.50
151 Belarus 59.50
152 Fiji 60.00
153 Russia 60.88
154 Tunisia 61.50
155 Brunei 63.50
156 Libya 64.50
157 Rwanda 64.67
158 Equatorial Guinea 65.50
159 Pakistan 65.67
160 Uzbekistan 67.67
161 Palestinian Authority 69.83
162 Sri Lanka 75.00
163 Saudi Arabia 76.50
164 Somalia 77.50
165 Syria 78.00
166 Vietnam 81.67
167 Yemen 83.38
168 People's Republic of China 84.50
169 Laos 92.00
170 Cuba 94.00
171 Myanmar 102.67
172 Iran 104.14
173 Turkmenistan 107.00
174 North Korea 112.5
175 Eritrea 115.50


Information from:

Sunday, 2 May 2010

Explain the liberal view of justice

0 comments
Here is an essay I wrote in 2009 while learning about liberalism

Robyn, UK

Explain the liberal view of justice

The liberal theory of justice is based on a belief in equality of various kinds. The liberal belief in individualism implies a commitment to foundational equality, where human beings are born equal with each individual being of equal moral worth. This idea is embodied in the notion of natural rights. Foundational equality implies a belief in formal equality and the idea that individuals should enjoy the same formal status in society.

The most important forms of formal equality are legal and political equality. Legal equality emphasizes equality before the law and insists that all non-legal factors be irrelevant to the process of legal decision making. Political equality is embodied in the idea of ‘one person, one vote’ and underpins the liberal commitment to democracy.

Liberals subscribe to a belief in equality of opportunity, where every individual has the same chance to rise or fall in society. Liberals believe social equality is undesirable because people aren’t born the same but possess different talents and skills and some are prepared to work harder than others. Equality means that individuals should have an equal opportunity to develop their unequal skills and abilities.

Liberals believe it is right to reward merit, ability and willingness to work harder than others. This lead to a belief in meritocracy where inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings. A meritocratic society is socially just because individuals are judged by their talents and willingness to work rather than gender or race. Social equality is unjust because it treats unlike individuals alike.

Classic liberals believe justice requires that unequal individuals are not treated equally. Modern liberals also have taken social justice to imply a belief in some measure of social equality.

Thursday, 29 April 2010

Political Writing-Orwell

0 comments

According to Orwell political writing is used to “defend the indefensible” which means that it justifies killing other people for the sake of your gain. For example inside the text on page it says “Millions of peasants are robbed of their farms and sent trudging along the roads with no more than they can carry”. This statement says that the people/politicians in power really don’t mind sacrificing lives for gain. The land served a purpose for the politicians. They are going to get the land even if it means people leaving their homes with only their clothes.

Language is an important as a way of knowing because it allows you to know the difference between truths. Whenever someone speaks to a person that person would know if it is true. For example when President Bush tells us about war we as people can tell that there is something he isn’t telling us. President Bush isn’t telling us about the thousands of innocent people dying because of the war. He is not telling us that due to the war hundreds of children will not see their parents because unfortunately they were the causalities of war.

The corruption of language could lead to a totalitarian ideology such as “Fascism” & “Stalinism” because NOW people are willing to believe anything by someone of political power. Hitler was the feur of Germany which meant he was looked up to upon the masses. He was such an influential person that whatever he said was to be had gotten done even if it meant killing millions of people. Hitler was by no means a good person and in fact his mind was so corrupt that he was willing to accept praises from the masses. He actually favored himself as a God. If the masses had thought for themselves he would not have climbed the political ladder as he did. He would not have been able to do the things that he did. Since he did get inside the mind of the masses he was able to kill millions of Gays, Jews, Blacks, Gypsies and more. He had no remorse for human lives.

If the masses had thought for themselves he would have been out of office and in prison when he first proposed such an idea as this. Millions of PEOPLE died, not objects but HUMAN LIVES were taken for the simple fact that they did not fit into his idea of a German Society. This goes to show that if not corrected the Dark Nature of Man will take control of person just for the concept of POWER. If the Dark Nature of Man speaks the language in which people with no beliefs for themselves and they feel that they may benefit it takes control of them now.

Why do liberals reject unlimited freedom?

1 comments
Here is an essay I wrote in 2009 when I was studying Liberalism

Robyn, UK

Why do liberals reject unlimited freedom?

Freedom is a core theme of liberalism and they believe individual liberty is a supreme political value. Although classical liberal believe liberty is an essential natural right for human existence and modern liberals see liberty as the only condition where people are able fulfil their potential, no liberals accept that individuals have an absolute entitlement to freedom.

They believe that unlimited freedom can become a ‘licence’ and give individuals the right to abuse others. This is related to the liberal belief that the individual is egotistical and self-seeking and it may be in the interest of certain individuals to abuse other individuals. Therefore John Mill argued that the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.

While liberals agree on the value of liberty, they disagree on what it means for an individual to be free. Classical liberals believe in negative freedom which is the absence of external restrictions or constraints on the individual, allowing freedom of choice. Modern liberals, however, believe in positive freedom which is based on the achievement of autonomy and the development of human capacities.

Liberals reject unlimited freedom because they do not believe that a balanced and tolerant society will develop naturally out of the free actions of the individuals. They fear that completely free individuals may wish to exploit others if it is n their interests to do so. Therefore, liberals believe that our liberty requires that others are restrained from encroaching on our freedom and that their liberty is safeguarded from us. This relates back to liberals belief in a liberal state as this protection can only be provided by a sovereign state capable of restraining all individuals and groups within society.

Wednesday, 28 April 2010

Muammar al-Gaddafi and his trouble with the West

0 comments

Muammar Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi1 (also known as Colonel Gaddafi; born 1942) has been the de facto leader of Libya since a coup in 1969. He is the longest-serving ruler of Libya. As an early follower of Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser and his Arab socialist and nationalism ideal, he took a part as a teenager in anti-Israeli demonstrations during Suez Crisis. An early conspirator, he begun first plan to overthrow monarchy while in military college. He received further military training in the United Kingdom.

On 1 September 1969, a small group of junior military officers led by Gaddafi staged a bloodless coup d'état against King Idris I, while he was in Kamena Vourla, a Greek resort, for medical treatment. His nephew the Crown Prince Sayyid Hasan ar-Rida al-Mahdi as-Sanussi had been formally deposed by the revolutionary army officers and put under house arrest; they abolished the monarchy and proclaimed the new Libyan Arab Republic. The 27-year-old Gaddafi sought to become the new "Che Guevara of the age". To accomplish this Gaddafi turned Libya into a haven for anti-Western radicals, where any group, supposedly, could receive weapons and financial assistance, provided they claimed to be fighting imperialism. The Italian population in Libya almost disappeared after Gaddafi ordered the expulsion of Italians in 1970.

Throughout the 1970s, his regime was implicated in subversion and terrorist activities in both Arab and non-Arab countries. By the mid-1980s, he was widely regarded in the West as the principal financier of international terrorism. Reportedly, Gaddafi was a major financier of the "Black September Movement" which perpetrated the Munich massacre at the 1972 Summer Olympics, and was accused by the United States of being responsible for direct control of the 1986 Berlin discotheque bombing that killed three people and wounded more than 200, of whom a substantial number were U.S. servicemen. He is also said to have paid "Carlos the Jackal" to kidnap and then release a number of Saudi Arabian and Iranian oil ministers.

Tensions between Libya and the West reached a peak during the Ronald Reagan administration, which tried to overthrow Gaddafi. The Reagan administration viewed Libya as a belligerent rogue state because of its uncompromising stance on Palestinian independence, its support for revolutionary Iran in the 1980–1988 war against Saddam Hussein's Iraq, and its backing of "liberation movements" in the developing world. Reagan himself dubbed Gaddafi the "mad dog of the Middle East". In December 1981, the US State Department invalidated US passports for travel to Libya, and in March 1982, the U.S. declared a ban on the import of Libyan oil and the export to Libya of U.S. oil industry technology; European nations did not follow suit. The U.S. attacked Libyan patrol boats from January to March 1986 during clashes over access to the Gulf of Sidra, which Libya claimed as territorial waters. On 15 April 1986, Ronald Reagan ordered major bombing raids, dubbed Operation El Dorado Canyon, against Tripoli and Benghazi killing 45 Libyan military and government personnel as well as 15 civilians.This strike followed U.S. interception of telex messages from Libya's East Berlin embassy suggesting Libyan government involvement in a bomb explosion on 5 April in West Berlin's La Belle discothèque, a nightclub frequented by U.S. servicemen. Among the alleged fatalities of the 15 April retaliatory attack by the U.S. was Gaddafi's adopted daughter, Hannah. Libya responded by firing two Scud missiles at the U.S. Coast Guard navigation station on the Italian island of Lampedusa, in retaliation for the bombing. The missiles landed in the sea, and caused no damage.

In 1984, British police constable Yvonne Fletcher was shot outside the Libyan Embassy in London while policing an anti-Gaddafi demonstration. A burst of machine-gun fire from within the building was suspected of killing her, but Libyan diplomats asserted their diplomatic immunity and were repatriated. The incident led to the breaking off of diplomatic relations between the United Kingdom and Libya for over a decade.In late 1987, a merchant vessel, the MV Eksund, was intercepted. Destined for the IRA, a large consignment of arms and explosives supplied by Libya was recovered from the Eksund. British intelligence believed this was not the first and that Libyan arms shipments had previously reached the IRA. An alleged plot by Britain's secret intelligence service to assassinate Colonel Gaddafi, when rebels attacked Gaddafi's motorcade near the city of Sirte in February 1996, was described as "pure fantasy" by former foreign secretary Robin Cook, although the FCO later admitted: "We have never denied that we knew of plots against Gaddafi."

For most of the 1990s, Libya endured economic sanctions and diplomatic isolation as a result of Gaddafi's refusal to allow the extradition to the United States or Britain of two Libyans accused of planting a bomb on Pan Am Flight 103, which exploded over Lockerbie, Scotland. Through the intercession of South African President Nelson Mandela – who made a high-profile visit to Gaddafi in 1997 – and U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, Gaddafi agreed in 1999 to a compromise that involved handing over the defendants to the Netherlands for trial under Scottish law.: U.N. sanctions were thereupon suspended, but U.S. sanctions against Libya remained in force. In August 2003, two years after Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi's conviction, Libya wrote to the United Nations formally accepting 'responsibility for the actions of its officials' in respect of the Lockerbie bombing and agreed to pay compensation of up to US$2.7 billion – or up to US$10 million each – to the families of the 270 victims. The same month, Britain and Bulgaria co-sponsored a U.N. resolution which removed the suspended sanctions. (Bulgaria's involvement in tabling this motion led to suggestions that there was a link with the HIV trial in Libya in which 5 Bulgarian nurses, working at a Benghazi hospital, were accused of infecting 426 Libyan children with HIV.) As a result, President Bush signed an executive order restoring the Libyan government's immunity from terror-related lawsuits and dismissing all of the pending compensation cases in the US, the White House said. Gaddafi's 2009 welcome to the return of convicted Lockerbie bomber Megrahi, who was released from prison on compassionate grounds, attracted criticism from Western leaders and disrupted his first-ever visit to the United States to attend a UN General Session.

Gaddafi appeared to be attempting to improve his image in the West. Two years prior to the September 11, 2001 attacks, Libya pledged its commitment to fighting Al-Qaeda and offered to open up its weapons programme to international inspection. The Bush administration did not pursue the offer at the time since Libya's weapons program was not then regarded as a threat, and the matter of handing over the Lockerbie bombing suspects took priority. Following the attacks of 11 September, Gaddafi made one of the first, and firmest, denunciations of the Al-Qaeda bombers by any Muslim leader. Gaddafi also appeared on ABC for an open interview with George Stephanopoulos, a move that would have seemed unthinkable less than a decade earlier.
Following the overthrow of Saddam Hussein by US forces in 2003, Gaddafi announced that his nation had an active weapons of mass destruction program, but was willing to allow international inspectors into his country to observe and dismantle them. US President George W. Bush and other supporters of the Iraq War portrayed Gaddafi's announcement as a direct consequence of the Iraq War by stating that Gaddafi acted out of fear for the future of his own regime if he continued to keep and conceal his weapons. Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi, a supporter of the Iraq War, was quoted as saying that Gaddafi had privately phoned him, admitting as much. Many foreign policy experts, however, contend that Gaddafi's announcement was merely a continuation of his prior attempts at normalizing relations with the West and getting the sanctions removed. To support this, they point to the fact that Libya had already made similar offers starting four years prior to it finally being accepted. International inspectors turned up several tons of chemical weaponry in Libya, as well as an active nuclear weapons program. As the process of destroying these weapons continued, Libya improved its cooperation with international monitoring regimes to the extent that, by March 2006, France was able to conclude an agreement with Libya to develop a significant nuclear power program.

In March 2004, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair became one of the first Western leaders in decades to visit Libya and publicly meet Gaddafi. Blair praised Gaddafi's recent acts, and stated that he hoped Libya could now be a strong ally in the international War on Terrorism. On 15 May 2006, the US State Department announced that it would restore full diplomatic relations with Libya, once Gaddafi declared he was abandoning Libya's weapons of mass destruction program. The State Department also said that Libya would be removed from the list of nations supporting terrorism. On 31 August 2006, however, Gaddafi openly called upon his supporters to "kill enemies" who asked for political change. In July 2007, French president Nicolas Sarkozy visited Libya and signed a number of bilateral and multilateral (EU) agreements with Gaddafi. On 4 March 2008 Gaddafi announced his intention to dissolve the country's existing administrative structure and disburse oil revenue directly to the people. The plan includes abolishing all ministries, except those of defence, internal security, and foreign affairs, and departments implementing strategic projects. In September 2008, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice visited Libya and met with Gaddafi as part of a North African tour. This was the first visit to Libya by a US Secretary of State since 1953. In January 2009, Gaddafi contributed an editorial to the New York Times, suggesting that he was in favor of a single-state solution to the Israeli and Palestinian conflicts that moved beyond old conflicts and looked to a unified future of shared culture and mutual respect.

On 30 August 2008, Gaddafi and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi signed a historic cooperation treaty in Benghazi. Under its terms, Italy will pay $5 billion to Libya as compensation for its former military occupation. In exchange, Libya will take measures to combat illegal immigration coming from its shores and boost investments in Italian companies.The treaty was ratified by Italy in 6 February 2009, and by Libya on 2 March, during a visit to Tripoli by Berlusconi. In June Gaddafi made his first visit to Rome, where he met Prime Minister Berlusconi, President Giorgio Napolitano and Senate President Renato Schifani; Chamber President Gianfranco Fini cancelled the meeting because of Gaddafi's delay. The Democratic Party and Italy of Values opposed the visit, and many protests were staged throughout Italy by human rights organizations and the Radical Party. Gaddafi also took part in the G8 summit in L'Aquila in July as Chairman of the African Union. During the summit a handshake between US President Barack Obama and Muammar Gaddafi took place (the first time the Libyan leader has been greeted by a serving US president), then at summit's official dinner offered by President Giorgio Napolitano US and Libyan leaders upset the ceremony and sat by the Italian Prime Minister and G8 host, Silvio Berlusconi. (According to ceremony, Gaddafi should seat three places after Berlusconi).

In September 2009, at a South America-Africa summit on Isla Margarita in Venezuela, Colonel Gaddafi joined the host, Hugo Chávez, in calling for an "anti-imperialist" front across Africa and Latin America. Gaddafi proposed the establishment of a South Atlantic Treaty Organization to rival NATO, saying: "The world’s powers want to continue to hold on to their power. Now we have to fight to build our own power."

Quotes made by Gaddafi

"God damn America" – Time magazine, April 2, 1973

"The statements of our Kenyan brother of American nationality, Obama, on Jerusalem ... show that he either ignores international politics and did not study the Middle East conflict or that it [Barack Obama's expression of solidarity with Israel] is a campaign lie. We fear that Obama will feel that, because he is black with an inferiority complex, this will make him behave worse than the whites. This will be a tragedy. We tell him to be proud of himself as a black and feel that all Africa is behind him."

"It is a response to greedy Western nations, who invade and exploit Somalia’s water resources illegally. It is not a piracy, it is self defence. It is defending the Somalia children’s food. If they (Western nations) do not want to live with us fairly, it is our planet and they can go to other planet."

"Any Muslim in any part of the world who works with Switzerland is an apostate -- is against Muhammad, God and the Quran,"

"There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe - without swords, without guns, without conquests. The 50 million Muslims of Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades."

Interview with Larry King












Information from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muammar_al-Gaddafi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjNAGyMCEik&feature=related
Photobucket